Nikola Tesla Secret
Showing posts with label rules. Show all posts
Showing posts with label rules. Show all posts

Sunday, 26 April 2015

Indiana wind power could get boost from new EPA rules


Credit the ice ages for making Indiana a good place to turn wind into electricity. All that glacial action scoured flat the northern half of the state and sculpted the perfect terrain for wind turbines.


A few million years later, the Environmental Protection Agency is about to use regulatory fiat to make the state even more attractive to industrial windmills.


New EPA rules coming down the pike will cut carbon emissions from coal and gas power plants for the first time and boost demand for clean power such as wind. One result: Indiana could see two or three times as many wind farms as it has now.


In its latest projection of U.S. wind energy needs, the federal Department of Energy says only five other states are in line to boost their wind power sectors as much as or more than Indiana.


Indiana has a good shot at tripling its wind power capacity in the next decade or so, from the current 1,744 megawatts to 5,000 or more, says Sean Brady, Midwest policy manager for the wind power advocacy group Wind on the Wires.


That would require erecting 2,000 wind turbines to join the 1,031 that now dot the state’s landscape north of Indianapolis. “Indiana has quite a large upside. It has a great opportunity for wind development,” Brady said.


If growth of that magnitude occurs, investment in the state’s wind farms would have to soar from $3.7 billion to more than $10 billion, making wind farms one of the most expensive industrial installations in state history.


Whether wind power actually has that kind of upside, however, depends on a few cards being played just so.


For one thing, not everyone in the public policy arena thinks that wind is the way to go. It is, after all, a variable power source that you can’t rely on to generate the juice when needed. (Indiana’s four-season winds are especially fickle, with a fivefold difference in breeziness between the least windy month, August, and the windiest, November. Regional power grid operator MISO tracks wind power use by the hour and posts it online.)




Wind power, in addition, is expensive to install ($2 million or more per turbine) and controlled to a great extent by foreign companies, which doesn’t bode well for winning a lot of public support.


Also, demand for wind energy depends on Congress renewing the federal tax credit that wind developers rely on to be price-competitive with other forms of energy. The credit expired at the end of last year and renewal isn’t a given.


And one last thing: The proposed EPA CO2 rules are fraught with sticky issues, gray areas and unknowns that could tip in favor of wind or against it, depending on how they’re finally written.


“So much is up in the air,” said Joan Soller, director of resource planning at Indianapolis Power & Light Co.


One particularly sticky issue: EPA’s proposed “clean power plan” rules don’t give a utility any credit, under the CO2-lowering mandates, for using green energy in its generation portfolio if it buys wind power from outside its home state.


If that proviso stands, Indiana’s wind industry could be hurt because it currently sells the bulk of its power to non-Indiana utilities. They would be newly motivated to drop their Indiana contracts and buy their green energy from wind farms in their own states.


Utilities and other interests are lobbying the EPA to drop the rule giving credit only to home-state-bought green energy. The final EPA rules are expected out this summer. States also will have a say in the matter, so they’ll have to be lobbied, too. (Some states also are fighting the CO2 rules in court.)


Whatever happens, Indiana likely won’t lose its standing as a big player in wind energy. It’s just too good a place to site wind farms.


The northern reaches of the state not only are prairie-flat, but they’re close to Chicago, Indianapolis and other big population centers that gobble megawatts of electricity. The state also overlaps the territories of two electrical system operators that distribute power from Canada to Louisiana and points east and west.


And, of course, it’s windy.


Wind farm developers in Indiana are already scouting out locations for new farms as the new EPA mandates march closer.


“We’re actively marketing sites to … gauge interest” from power users, said Ryan Brown, an executive vice president at EDP Renewables. “Expansion is definitely possible.”


Spanish-owned EDP already controls about 40 percent of the state’s wind turbines through its Meadow Lake wind farm in White County and its newly opened Headwaters farm in Randolph County.


Most of Indiana’s turbines were erected from 2008 to 2012. Growth has since slowed. Last year, Headwaters was the only major wind farm to open.




A proposed project in Benton County and another in and around Rush County are seen as leading contenders to be built next. Those projects would have about 70 turbines each.


In Indiana, “the easiest-to-develop projects have been developed,” and much of the best available ground for catching steady wind is taken, said Tristan Vance, director of the Indiana Office of Energy Development. “But I think we will see future projects here. We’ve been fairly open for wind development.”


Though the best sites for wind farms might indeed be snapped up, technological improvements have given the industry taller turbines with larger and lighter blades that capture more wind at higher altitudes than older, smaller turbines.


That should allow wind developers to continue to profit from Indiana’s wind at new sites with new turbines, said Brown of EDP.


At its Headwaters farm, EDP installed new turbines 312 feet tall from ground to gearhouse, with blades 180 feet long. Turbines at EDP’s older farm in White County along I-65 are 262 feet tall with blade lengths of 134 to 144 feet.


Because the bigger machines can catch more wind, they generate electricity about 40 percent of time, compared with about 33 percent of the time for the shorter turbines, Brown said.


(Turbines likely won’t get any taller. The Federal Aviation Administration requires special, harder-to-get approvals for turbines that exceed 500 feet from their base to the tip of an upright blade. The new turbines at Headwaters are just about at that 500-foot limit.)


With the bigger turbines, “Indiana is looking very attractive” for wind farm development down the road, said Michael Goggin, senior director of research for the American Wind Energy Association, a trade group for the wind industry. “At that height, (wind) is a very attractive resource in Indiana. It’s like being in the plains at that altitude.”


Any growth in wind farms also would put more money in the hands of farmland owners, who rent the land needed for the turbines. Average rents in Indiana now run about $5,000 a year per turbine, which amounts to about $5 million a year in statewide turbine rent payments.


For those who can get it, wind turbine rent “is pretty significant, especially if you have multiple turbines on a farm,” said Justin Schneider, senior policy adviser and counsel at Indiana Farm Bureau. “It can take off some of the risk of crop production if you have a bad year.”


Schneider said he thinks most Indiana farmland owners would be eager to rent their land for any new wind farm proposals that pop up.


Still, pushback to wind persists at policymaking levels. And that opposition could harden as wind energy use spreads and utilities are forced to spend billions of dollars nationally building transmission lines to handle the increased flow of power from new wind farms, said Tom Tanton, director of science and technology assessment at the Energy & Environment Legal Institute in Washington, D.C. The group has done studies suggesting federal subsidies to wind energy don’t make economic sense.


Tanton said wind farm developers are able to push “hidden costs” of wind energy onto utilities and ratepayers. Those costs include gas turbine plants required to back up wind power and balance its fluctuating energy flows caused by intermittent wind, he said.


Existing backup power sources can handle the fluctuations of wind energy now, since it supplies only about 4.5 percent of U.S. electrical use, Tanton said. But if wind energy boosts its share of the market much beyond that, a fleet of costly new backup gas turbine plants that can turn on and off with short notice will be required, he said.


IPL’s director of project development, Richard Benedict, said it’s tough for a utility to even calculate the true cost of electricity from wind energy because of the need for backup capacity.


Wind-generated electricity is so variable it almost doesn’t count as power in a conventional sense. IPL, for instance, has long-term contracts to buy 300 megawatts of electricity from wind farms in Indiana and out-of-state. But the Indianapolis utility can’t count those megawatts when calculating its official electrical capacity because they’re not reliably available, Benedict said.


“We (only) get it when the wind blows,” he said.


Still, the coming of the CO2 rules might force IPL to buy much more wind-generated electricity in the future. Under its pending rules, the EPA won’t allow IPL to claim CO2-lowering credits for the 66 percent of wind energy it now buys out-of-state, or for converting its coal-fired Martinsville plant to natural gas (because the conversion won’t happen by the deadline set in the rules).


If IPL can’t get credit for those green energy moves, it might have to turn to buying in-state wind energy in a big way.


IPL officials are trying to get their minds around the fact that they might have to buy as much as 1,000 megawatts of wind energy to meet the coming carbon-lowering standards. That move alone would create the demand for a 60 percent build-out, of about 600 turbines, in Indiana’s wind farms.


Call Star reporter Jeff Swiatek at (317) 444-6483. Follow him on Twitter: @JeffSwiatek.


Wind power in Indiana


(2014 data)


Turbines: 1,031 on six wind farms.


Electrical capacity: 1,744 megawatts.


Electrical output: 3,495 thousand MWh (0.4% increase from 2013).


Share of U.S. wind energy produced: 3% (enough to power 321,000 houses).


Largest month for production: November (507 thousand MWh).


Smallest month for production: August (101 thousand MWh).


Largest Indiana wind farm: Fowler Ridge (355 turbines in Benton County, operated by BP Wind).


Annual land rent paid by wind farms: More than $5 million (typical rent is $5,000 per turbine).


Wind energy employment: About 1,500 jobs.


Investment in wind farms: $3.7 billion.


Proposed new wind farms: 200 megawatts (Wayne, Henry counties by EDP Renewables); 150 MW (Benton County) by Amazon and partners; 140 MW (Fayette, Rush, Henry counties) by NextEnergy Resources. If built, they would increase Indiana’s wind farm generating capacity by 28 percent.


Read or Share this story: http://indy.st/1z8652m



Indiana wind power could get boost from new EPA rules

Wednesday, 9 July 2014

Court rules in Viking Energy's favour

A view of the proposed Viking Energy wind farm from the Kergord valley - Image: Viking Energy. A view of the proposed Viking Energy wind farm from the Kergord valley – Image: Viking Energy. THE CONSTRUCTION of a controversial 103-turbine wind farm in Shetland looks set to become a reality after the highest Scottish court ruled in the government’s favour.


Last September grassroots protest group Sustainable Shetland won its legal challenge against the Scottish Government after Lady Clark of Calton ruled its decision to grant planning consent for the Viking Energy project was incompetent.


She said the developer had not paid enough regard to the European Birds Directive in relation to the impact the project would have on the whimbrel, a rare wading bird.


But on Wednesday the Inner House of the Court of Session upheld Scottish ministers’ appeal against Lady Clark’s ruling – clearing the way for the project to go ahead more than two years after planning consent was granted.


Lord Brodie delivered the Inner House’s verdict that ministers acted lawfully in granting the project consent and that there was no breach of the birds directive.


Viking Energy Shetland chairman Alan Bryce welcomed the ruling. Viking Energy Shetland chairman Alan Bryce welcomed the ruling. Developer Viking Energy said it was “pleased” that energy minister Fergus Ewing’s decision in April 2012 “has been vindicated today and we can now move on”.


Viking Energy Shetland chairman Alan Bryce said: “We believed the consent decision would stand up to the closest scrutiny and this outcome validates our position that this project can benefit the local and wider environment.


“The potential for substantial economic and environmental benefits for Shetland means that Viking Energy is in this for the long haul and we continue to look forward to advancing our plans to build what could become the world’s most productive wind farm and a crown jewel of Shetland’s economy.”


The decision will come as a bitter blow to members of Sustainable Shetland, which raised a six-figure sum in order to take its battle to stop the wind farm to the highest court in Scotland.


Its vice chairman James Mackenzie said the group was “disappointed that it has gone in the ministers’ favour”.


“We didn’t expect for the competency issue going our way, and we didn’t challenge that anyway, but we had hoped that the birds directive would have gone our way,” he said.


Vice chairman James Mackenzie said Sustainable Shetland would consider its options. Vice chairman James Mackenzie said Sustainable Shetland would consider its options. “I haven’t studied the legal argument closely to say more, but our options now depend on the legal advice we are getting, and also on consulting our committee and our membership at large.


“We are still opposed to this development and we would not have done all this without the support of the membership and many other people who have been so generous”.


In a recent opinion column Mackenzie said that Sustainable Shetland may well consider going to the European Court of Justice should they lose their appeal.


Due to a cost restriction order granted in 2012, the group is now expected to pay only £5,000 of the Scottish Government’s legal costs as well as its own.


The decision will boost the SNP government’s aspiration to turn the country into the green energy powerhouse of Europe.


A government spokesman said the 457 megawatt project would play a “crucial part in triggering the installation” of a proposed 600 megawatt subsea cable connecting Shetland to the UK National Grid, enabling it to export electricity to the mainland.


“Establishing this infrastructure will also be a great incentive to other energy technologies being developed on the island,” the spokesman said, adding today’s decision “allows work to begin towards delivering this wind farm project”.


“Ministers are pleased to note that the courts have confirmed applications may continue to be accepted from parties who do not hold a generation licence at the time of application,” the spokesman said.


“We also welcome that the courts have confirmed that the Scottish ministers’ decision was lawful and that they had proper regard to the likely impact of the grant of consent on wild bird populations. This is welcome news for the renewables industry in Scotland.”


The spokesman added that the wind farm was forecast to bring £566 million of capital spending and an annual income of around £30 million a year to the islands.


The full judgement can be read here.



Court rules in Viking Energy"s favour

Wednesday, 14 May 2014

Wind-energy projects must nagivate rules to protect birds


A national bird conservation group has signaled its intent to sue the federal government over new rules that give legal immunity to wind farms that unintentionally kill protected bald and golden eagles.


The American Bird Conservancy notified the U.S. Department of Interior last month that it will take legal action in response to the new rules that went into effect in January. They allow wind farms to obtain voluntary 30-year “take” permits, which protect them against prosecution for accidental eagle deaths. Previously, wind companies had been allowed to seek five-year permits.


The wind industry has praised the change for offering much needed, long-term certainty on what had been a legal gray area, while some conservation groups have called the permits a license to kill. Ultimately, the legal fight might not have great consequences for South Dakota, where there’s little evidence indicating the state’s wind farms are causing eagle fatalities.


South Dakota Public Utilities Commission Chairman Gary Hanson said while high numbers of reported golden eagle deaths are reported in wind-farm accidents in California and Montana, “there really haven’t been many reported at all in South Dakota. I don’t know if there will be much effect here.”


Joe Sullivan, regional policy manager for Wind on the Wires, a wind industry advocacy group, said overall that about 2 percent of golden eagle mortality is attributed to wind farms. Echoing Hanson, he also said South Dakota’s wind farms are not in areas commonly used by golden and bald eagles.


Paul Bachman, executive director of the South Dakota Wind Energy Association, said the longer permits reflect the reality of financing wind projects.


“It’s almost necessary,” he said. “No bank is going to put up financing unless you have the ability to control your costs. You need to know what your costs are going to be throughout the lifetime of a project.”


Other protections


In an announcement of the regulatory change in the Federal Register in April 2013, U.S. Fish and Widlife proposed to safeguard eagles despite issuing 30-year permits by forcing energy companies to commit up front to taking steps necessary to protect the birds.


“We intend to incorporate into the terms and conditions of the permit a commitment from the applicant to implement additional specified mitigation measures that would be triggered if new scientific information demonstrates that the additional mitigation measures are necessary for the preservation of eagles,” the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service wrote. “These additional specified mitigation measures could be described in detail in the permit so as to reduce uncertainty with respect to costs.”


Good luck with that, said Michael Hutchins. He’s the national coordinator of ABC’s Bird Smart Wind Energy Campaign.


“The methods to mitigate the impact of wind turbines on birds and bats are highly untested,” he said. Of the permit change, he said: “Basically, this is a big experiment with our public resources in the balance.”


ABC has other concerns. Because wind-energy companies self-report bird fatalities, the veracity of those numbers is difficult to verify, and U.S. Fish and Wildlife maintains the information as proprietary. Such lack of transparency makes it difficult to get a true fix on bird and bat deaths caused by wind-energy projects, Hutchins said.


“Birds and bats are a public trust resource,” he said. “he public has a right to know how many are being killed. We can’t find out. Nobody will tell us.”


Estimates range as high as 880,000, Hutchins said. The number of deaths related to wind farms might seem insignificant when compared with U.S. Fish and Wildlife estimates of other sources of bird mortality. Collisions with buildings might kill 97 million to 976 million birds annually, and collisions with vehicles 60 million, according to the federal agency. As many as 72 million birds might die of pesticide and other poisoning annually, and cats are fierce predators of songbirds, killing an estimated 39 million birds annually in Wisconsin alone, according to one study.


Hutchins counters that number of birds killed by wind farms “is not trivial,” especially in light of all the other dangers birds face. “The impacts are cumulative. Altogether, they are really hammering the native bird populations,” he said.


ABC strongly supports wind energy, Hutchins said. But it must be adequately regulated and fit within a larger philosophy of reducing the world’s dependence on petroleum, coal and natural gas.


“Wind and solar both can be quite destructive if they’re poorly sited and poorly managed,” he said. Such projects need to stay away from critical bird and bat habitat. In addition, renewable energy development must be accompanied by a corresponding reduction in fossil fuel plants. “It’s not happening,” Hutchins said.


A robust application of the federal Endangered Species Act and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act ideally should be part of a series of comprehensive federal and state guidelines for permitting wind-energy development, Hutchins said.


“Now, it’s a free-for-all out there,” he said. “There’s stuff going up everywhere.”


Hanson said the PUC in South Dakota takes wind-energy permitting decisions seriously, and it doesn’t need a heavy overlay of federal regulations. He does, however, argue that 30-year permits should be reviewed at five-year intervals.


“Thirty years is too long to extend a permit without having a review,” Hanson said.


He is not troubled by the lack of a requirement for independent reporting of bird and bat deaths.


“It’s not something someone could hide very long unless they are out there picking up dead birds. … I don’t think we need a government bureaucracy checking on that.”


Whooping cranes


But while eagles might not be in great jeopardy from wind power development in South Dakota, Hanson is concerned about endangered whooping cranes.


“There are fewer than 500 whooping cranes. The flyway for whooping cranes is right down the corridor of the best locations for wind turbines. I am very concerned with the whooping crane population,” he said.


While the cranes tend to be high flyers when they migrate, they could be at risk from wind turbines during takeoffs and landings into wind farms at dawn, dusk and at night. Hanson said if the federal government were to require wind turbines to shut down during whooping crane migrations it would make “great sense.”


Again, federal intervention might be unnecessary, claims a wind industry advocate. Wind on the Wires’ Sullivan said he knows of one planned South Dakota wind-power development abandoned because it would have conflicted with whooping cranes. This is typical of developers’ reluctance to court environmental problems when siting new wind farms, he said.


South Dakota has enough wind to potentially generate 900,000 megawatts of wind energy.


“When you’ve got that much developable wind, why waste time on a 200-megawatt chunk that has got all those problems associated with it?” Sullivan said. “There is so much low-hanging fruit out there.”


Ironically, might the ABC lawsuit make South Dakota more attractive to wind-energy developers?


Competition is fierce among states to site new wind farms, and South Dakota’s tax structure puts it at a disadvantage, Bachman said. But if the ABC lawsuit forces the federal government to more aggressively protect eagles from wind turbines, would developers look more favorably on South Dakota where eagle mortality from wind farms so far doesn’t seem to be a big problem?


“That’s an interesting question,” Bachman said. “I’m afraid I don’t know the answer. It seems logical, but there’s no way to predict that.”


Migratory bird mortality


Many human-caused threats affect bird populations


number of birds killed


each year by wind turbines


killed by oil and wastewater pits


killed by communication towers



60 million



killed by cars



72 million



killed by pesticides



97 million



killed by windows



174 million



killed by power lines



39 million



killed by domestic cats,


in Wisconsin alone



Sources: Associated Press,


U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service




Wind-energy projects must nagivate rules to protect birds

Monday, 28 April 2014

New solar installation rules likely to raise costs


— A state board has issued new rules for solar panel installation that will require journeyman electricians to do more of the work, which is expected to raise the cost of installing the systems.




Hawaii’s Board of Electricians and Plumbers will require that electricians handle bonding and grounding the system, the Honolulu Star-Advertiser reported (http://bit.ly/1h7E3Fh ). Those are safety measures that keep people from getting shocked, by diverting current into the earth.


Solar energy system contractors previously handled that step. Leslie Cole-Brooks, the executive director of the Hawaii Solar Energy Association, said solar panels are now made so that an electrician isn’t needed to ground and bond the systems safely. The rules change will make installations slower and more expensive, she said.


“A significant number of panels have been installed, and nobody could bring forward any singular incident of property damage or personal injury because of an installation,” Cole-Brooks said.


There were about a million photovoltaic panels generating power in Hawaii at the end of 2013.


Building inspectors and electrical contractors had testified to the state board that they were concerned about safety. The number of installations in recent years led some companies to use unqualified workers, they said.


The safety concerns aren’t justified, and costs are likely to rise as a result of the new rules, said Gladys Marrone, government relations director for the Building Industry Association of Hawaii.


“From the building industry’s perspective, our mission (is) to keep construction costs down for homeowners,” she said.


The board won’t finalize the rules until its next meeting June 17, said Charlene Tamanaha, the boards’ executive officer. The board took up the issue after an information request by an affiliate of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 1186.




New solar installation rules likely to raise costs